Digital Platforms and Collective Participation: Decidim in the Quererla es Crearla Movement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782025000200149

Keywords:

Inclusive education, Decidim, Participatory action research, Participatory democracy, Inclusive school

Abstract

In a context where educational innovation also demands institutional transformation, the use of collaborative technological tools becomes essential. This article presents the experience of implementing the Decidim platform within the Quererla es Crearla movement for Inclusive Education, focusing specifically on its use during the organization of the Cataliza 2024 Workshop. The methodology employed combined systematization of experiences with Participatory Action Research (PAR), carried out in collaboration with educational collectives from Spain and Latin America. The use of Decidim facilitated remote coordination, process documentation, and the expansion of the movement’s participatory base. Its modular design, differentiated levels of participation, and privacy settings contributed to establishing it as a shared digital space for collective decision-making within the movement. This experience highlights the potential of democratic digital infrastructures in inclusive educational processes. However, it also reveals ongoing challenges, such as the need for continuous participant training and the effective integration of physical and virtual spaces.

Author Biography

Fátima Solera Navarro, Universidad de Málaga

Cultural project manager and researcher in digital communication, focusing on privacy, the commons and democratic participation. She holds a PhD in Education and Social Communication from the University of Malaga (2025) and has spent time at IN3–UOC and the University of Vienna. She has contributed to competitive projects for the Ministry of Science and Innovation (RTI2018-099218-A-I00 and PID2022-140193OB-I00) and participated in international conferences in Spain and Brazil. His work combines critical research and cultural practice, with publications on obfuscation, technopolitics and participatory democracy, as well as participation in international projects and conferences on inclusion and social technologies.

References

Barandiaran, X., Calleja-López, A., Monterde, A. y Romero, C. (2024) Decidim, a technopolitical network for participatory democracy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50784- 7_1

Barriga, C. (2022). Educación inclusiva: Quererla es crearla [Video]. Narrativas emergentes sobre la escuela inclusiva desde el Modelo Social de la Discapacidad. Resistencia, resiliencia y cambio social (RTI2018-099218-A-I00).

Barranquero, A. (2007). Concepto, instrumentos y desafíos de la edu-comunicación para el cambio social. Comunicar, 29, 115-120. https://doi.org/10.3916/C29-2007-16

Benkler, Y. (2015). La riqueza de las redes (Trad. M. Itatí Portillo et al.). Icaria.

Calderón-Almendros, I., Mojtar Mendienta, L. y Cabello Fernández-Delgado, F. (2021). Cómo hacer inclusiva tu escuela. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional.

Calderón-Almendros, I. y Rascón Gómez, M. T. (Coords.). (2020). Análisis y propuestas para una nueva Ley Educativa. Conversaciones de la ciudadanía sobre la escuela inclusiva. Octaedro.

Calderón-Almendros, I. y Rascón Gómez, M. T. (2022). Hilando luchas por el derecho a la educación: Narrativas colectivas y personales para la inclusión desde el modelo social de la discapacidad. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 41, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2022.41.03

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: theoretical under pinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000195236

Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. Bergin & Garvey Publishers.

Haraway, D. J. (1995). Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres. La reinvención de la naturaleza (Trad. M. Talens). Ediciones Cátedra, Universitat de València, Instituto de la Mujer.

Hartsock, N. (1975). Fundamental Feminism: Process and Perspective. Quest, II(2), 67-80.

Kelty, C. (2019). Two Bits. La trascendencia cultural del software libre (Trad. A. M. Alconchel et al.). Icaria.

Mojtar Mendieta, L., Rascón-Gómez, M. T. y Calderón-Almendros, I. (2025). Students as subjects. Resistance, youth agency, and inclusive education through participatory action research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(3) 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2025.2454281

Solera Navarro, F. y Cabello Fernández-Delgado, F. (2024, 15 de mayo). Cómo rodar un movimiento: el proceso de creación del documental “Educación inclusiva: Quererla es crearla”. [Ponencia]. V Congreso Internacional sobre Movimientos Sociales y TIC Move.net.

Stallman, R. (2004). Software libre para una sociedad libre (Trad. J. Rowan, D. Sanz Paratcha y L. Trinidad). Traficantes de Sueños.

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Solera Navarro, F. (2025). Digital Platforms and Collective Participation: Decidim in the Quererla es Crearla Movement. Revista Latinoamericana De Educación Inclusiva, 19(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782025000200149